- Reply to: Connection not private warnings with Net Nanny6 years 6 months ago…: Killed by Proxy-Analyzing Client-end TLS Interception Softwareby: JonDunno if it mentions NN, but thought you'd be interested. Published in 2017. http://wp.…
- Reply to: Connection not private warnings with Net Nanny6 years 6 months ago…: Only some sitesby: James OakleyIndeed that's a very good question. I suspect it relates to something else that I don't understand…
- Reply to: Connection not private warnings with Net Nanny6 years 6 months ago…: My Subscription expiredby: James OakleyI've not used it at all. I told them that they had 3 months until my subscription ran out. I…
- Reply to: Connection not private warnings with Net Nanny6 years 6 months ago…: Firefoxby: James OakleyThanks for checking. Firefox enforces disuse of SHA1, so it's truly odd that it doesn't choke…
- Reply to: Connection not private warnings with Net Nanny6 years 7 months ago…: A shame really. I'd beby: JonA shame really. I'd be curious what this higher priority project is. Better be worth the loss of…
- Reply to: Connection not private warnings with Net Nanny6 years 7 months ago…: I just tested the Animal Jamby: JonI just tested the Animal Jam for you (https://www.animaljam.com/welcome). I tested loading the main…
- Reply to: Connection not private warnings with Net Nanny6 years 7 months ago…: I use Firefox 99.99% of theby: JonI use Firefox 99.99% of the time. I only use Chrome for Google Drive which has worked fine. This…
- Reply to: Connection not private warnings with Net Nanny6 years 7 months ago…: A very well written explanation of SSLby: JonI've been working on PCs since 1996 and doing Desktop Support / Helpdesk since 2005. I've always…
- Reply to: Connection not private warnings with Net Nanny6 years 7 months ago…: What's holding up NN fromby: JonWhat's holding up NN from updating their certificate to SHA256?
- Reply to: Connection not private warnings with Net Nanny6 years 7 months ago…: I did acknowledge the otherby: James OakleyI did acknowledge the other commenter So you did. :-) (Sorry I missed that!) I'd be curious as…